It seems lately that many students who are using our Lab are coming in for issues that are more reading-related than writing-related. Of course, these are two sides of the same coin and one skill informs the other. But often students miss the point that they can’t write a thorough response until they’ve understood the reading to which they are responding. And, often students are coming in very shortly before the assignment is due looking for that miracle, that somehow they will pull off an excellent grade through the power of their hope with a little tutoring thrown in. It seems we are often put in the position of holding difficult lines. No one wants to disappoint a student or burst that hopeful bubble, but it is our job to be realistic with students. If someone comes in who hasn’t understood a reading, then they must first get some help from a reading tutor before we can step in and help with the written response. How do we decide how much reading is too much reading? How can we tell the scope of the reading issue? Is it vocabulary, decoding, identifying main points, understanding inferences? These are all reading-specific problems, most of which seem to be happening with courses outside of English—difficulty with discipline-specific assignments from History, Psychology, or Sociology. This is the time to get out the Reading Lab schedule and try to make a connection for a student there. However, if someone comes in and wants to discuss the content of a piece of literature as it relates to their writing assignment, then this is more in line with our purpose, so go ahead and tutor your heart out.
No comments:
Post a Comment